From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Will Deacon Subject: Re: next-20160210 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160210) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:12:39 +0000 Message-ID: <20160210101238.GC1052@arm.com> References: <20160210100837.GT13270@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:45861 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751994AbcBJKMg (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 05:12:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160210100837.GT13270@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Mark Brown Cc: Catalin Marinas , Andrew Pinski , kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:08:37AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 09:12:25AM +0000, Build bot for Mark Brown wrote: > > Today's -next fails to build an arm64 allmodconfig due to: > > > arm64-allmodconfig > > ../arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h:183:15: error: expected string literal before 'ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN' > > due to 52e662326e1e915 (arm64: prefetch: don't provide > spin_lock_prefetch with LSE) which adds use of ARM64_LSE_ATOMIC_INSN but > does not add an inclusion of asm/lse.h which defines it. Most files > have an implicit include so build fine but a few don't which causes the > failure. It does add an inclusion of asm/alternative.h which may be the > best place to add the inclusion. I just sent a fix to the list. Will