From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: arm qemu test failures due to 'driver-core: platform: probe of-devices only using list of compatibles' Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:58:18 +0000 Message-ID: <20160215085818.GC10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20160214165010.GA3189@roeck-us.net> <20160214195501.GA12289@pengutronix.de> <20160214200755.GB10826@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20160215081750.GD12289@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160215081750.GD12289@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:17:50AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > Hello Russell, >=20 > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:07:55PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wr= ote: > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 08:55:01PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > > > So the unexpected abnormality here is that even though this devic= e is > > > instantiated by dt, the driver doesn't provide any compatibles. > > > Either my expectation is wrong, then 67d02a1bbb33455 should be re= verted > >=20 > > Your expectation is wrong. AMBA primecell devices have hardware ID= s > > and are matched to their drivers by those IDs. Just like PCI. >=20 > pci devices don't appear in dt, do they? I don't see the connection > between amba devices and platform devices, see my other mail in this > thread for some more details. They both have hardware IDs, and they are both matched via those hardwa= re IDs. Your change has introduced a regression and is therefore wrong. --=20 RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/ =46TTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net.