From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, pkeys: fix siginfo ABI breakage from new field Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:41:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20160227114154.GA16200@gmail.com> References: <20160226173427.54A6949F@viggo.jf.intel.com> <6C5C3B9B-CAD6-4010-9A3E-AFFF7E13FAE3@zytor.com> <20160227091013.6e0606d1@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:36539 "EHLO mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756185AbcB0LmA (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Feb 2016 06:42:00 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160227091013.6e0606d1@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, deller@gmx.de * Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:44:00 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > > > > > > __u64 is okay, "unsigned long" is really messy in the presence of 32-on-64 bit ABIs... > > Yeah, but unfortunately, any 64 bit scalar type here will change the > alignment of the enclosing unions on (some) 32 bit platforms and thus > break the ABI. Then a different solution has to be found. Thanks, Ingo