From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 15:42:31 +1100 Message-ID: <20160229154231.5e6f0804@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:35988 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753320AbcB2Eme (ORCPT ); Sun, 28 Feb 2016 23:42:34 -0500 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Srinivas Pandruvada Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c between commit: 7791e4aa59ad ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Enable HWP by default") from the pm tree and commit: bc696ca05f5a ("x86/cpufeature: Replace the old static_cpu_has() with safe variant") from the tip tree. I fixed it up (the former removed the code modified by the latter) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell