From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin LaHaise Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the aio tree with the vfs tree Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:24:38 -0400 Message-ID: <20160314152438.GG17923@kvack.org> References: <20160314153214.41d7c2fe@canb.auug.org.au> <20160314073523.GA16639@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kanga.kvack.org ([205.233.56.17]:50473 "EHLO kanga.kvack.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932431AbcCNPYj (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:24:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160314073523.GA16639@lst.de> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Al Viro , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 08:35:23AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The aio changes have either been reviewed negatively or not at all. That > tree should be dropped. That isn't solely your decision. If you have comments, please provide constructive feedback, as there are users and use-cases that need this kind of functionality. -ben -- "Thought is the essence of where you are now."