From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mateusz Guzik Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 2 [WARNING: at fs/dcache.c] Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 12:33:54 +0200 Message-ID: <20160502103352.x4thudsnc3jhexzo@mguzik> References: <20160502184018.502e9e7c@canb.auug.org.au> <20160502101524.GA417@swordfish> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58667 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753057AbcEBKeD (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 May 2016 06:34:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160502101524.GA417@swordfish> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:15:24PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (05/02/16 18:40), Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Changes since 20160429 > > Hello, > > [ 0.368791] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 0.368850] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at fs/dcache.c:1688 d_set_d_op+0x5e/0xcc > [ 0.368911] Modules linked in: > [ 0.369002] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.6.0-rc6-next-20160502-dbg-00005-gf58c9da-dirty #404 > [ 0.369161] 0000000000000000 ffff880133067908 ffffffff811b8202 0000000000000000 > [ 0.369371] 0000000000000000 ffff880133067948 ffffffff81039365 00000698e5dffe26 > [ 0.369580] ffff880132c090c0 ffffffff81613680 ffff880132c040a0 ffff880132c08000 > [ 0.369791] Call Trace: > [ 0.369846] [] dump_stack+0x4d/0x63 > [ 0.369904] [] __warn+0xb8/0xd3 > [ 0.369962] [] warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x1a > [ 0.370021] [] d_set_d_op+0x5e/0xcc > [ 0.370079] [] simple_lookup+0x2e/0x45 The issue is that 2 macros have the same value: #define DCACHE_OP_REAL 0x08000000 #define DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP 0x08000000 /* being looked up (with parent locked shared) */ Verified with switching one to 0x10000000 and the warning went away. -- Mateusz Guzik