From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Corbet Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the drm tree Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 09:48:48 -0600 Message-ID: <20160627094848.3ea53331@lwn.net> References: <20160627133124.4e3e8dfd@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from tex.lwn.net ([70.33.254.29]:33274 "EHLO vena.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751742AbcF0Psu (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:48:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160627133124.4e3e8dfd@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Dave Airlie , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula , Daniel Vetter On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 13:31:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the jc_docs tree got a conflict in: > > Documentation/index.rst > > between commit: > > cb597fcea5c2 ("Documentation/gpu: add new gpu.rst converted from DocBook gpu.tmpl") > > from the drm tree and commit: > > 17defc282fe6 ("Documentation: add meta-documentation for Sphinx and kernel-doc") > > from the jc_docs tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Sigh, I fear that index.rst could become a bit of a conflict magnet, at least in the near future as documents are being added. The fix is obviously correct, thanks. jon