From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:49:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160715154930.GC3115@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160715154326.GC2523@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 12:43:26PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Ok, same results, it works, queuing this one, ack?
Sure. Although I'm still somewhat puzzled by the duplicated effort of
__BITS_PER_LONG and BITS_PER_LONG.
> commit a08cc3e6f7bb965672a3ff60f98d0dbbc5334ee7
> Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Date: Fri Jul 15 12:38:18 2016 -0300
>
> tools: Simplify BITS_PER_LONG define
>
> Do it using (__CHAR_BIT__ * __SIZEOF_LONG__), simpler, works everywhere,
> reduces the complexity by ditching CONFIG_64BIT, that was being
> synthesized from yet another set of defines, which proved fragile,
> breaking the build on linux-next for no obvious reasons.
If you ever do need to introduce CONFIG_64BIT, __LP64__ seems like the
right symbol to use for it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-15 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-15 7:06 linux-next: build failure after merge of the luto-misc tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-15 7:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-15 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-15 15:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 15:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-07-15 15:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 15:43 ` [PATCH/RFC] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-07-15 16:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-15 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-07-18 5:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18 20:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-18 20:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-18 22:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-18 23:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-19 0:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19 0:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-19 3:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19 12:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-19 17:45 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-19 23:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19 23:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-20 2:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-20 2:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-20 3:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-20 3:18 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-20 23:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-21 13:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-21 23:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-22 3:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 14:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-22 19:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 19:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-22 19:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-07-22 19:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-07-23 5:08 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-24 18:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-25 12:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160715154930.GC3115@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).