From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sh tree
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 14:18:06 +1000
Message-ID: <20160725141806.03f968aa@canb.auug.org.au>
References: <20160724175501.7a46e24f@canb.auug.org.au>
	<20160725035730.GR15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:40754 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750793AbcGYESJ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-next@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Jul 2016 00:18:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160725035730.GR15995@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-next.vger.kernel.org>
To: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Rich,

On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 23:57:30 -0400 Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>
> If it's acceptable I'll rebase this change into sh for-next and the
> patch I send to the subsystem maintainer.

Sure.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell