From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: next-20160929 build: 2 failures 4 warnings (next-20160929) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 00:44:05 +0200 Message-ID: <201609300044.05324.arnd@arndb.de> References: <20160929184737.ragquwy2tmhxo5bn@sirena.org.uk> <57ED66CA.3090903@akamai.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <57ED66CA.3090903@akamai.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org Cc: Vishwanath Pai , Mark Brown , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Joshua Hunt , Pablo Neira Ayuso List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Thursday 29 September 2016, Vishwanath Pai wrote: > I have sent a patch for this a couple of days ago to netdev, it hasn't > made it to net-next yet. Here's the latest one: > > [PATCH net-next v3] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: Fix link error in 32bit > arch because of 64bit division > > This should fix the link error. I also did a patch (not submitted yet), but my solution used 32-bit math for the version 1 case. I think that would be better so we don't slow down 32-bit architectures too much (div_u64_u64 is very slow). Arnd