From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 09:52:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20170126145240.GG29778@windriver.com> References: <20170119163959.07a25ca8@canb.auug.org.au> <20170123141159.GE7836@lianli.shorne-pla.net> <20170125163711.GE29778@windriver.com> <1014aa6f-447d-9dcc-2a60-01156dcdf88f@roeck-us.net> <20170126053801.GH7836@lianli.shorne-pla.net> <2a1ef925-a217-31b6-ada7-4a2a0dfae51f@roeck-us.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2a1ef925-a217-31b6-ada7-4a2a0dfae51f@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Stafford Horne , fengguang.wu@intel.com, Stephen Rothwell , Stefan Kristiansson , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , LKML List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org [Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 26/01/2017 (Thu 06:22) Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 01/25/2017 09:38 PM, Stafford Horne wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:54:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >>On 01/25/2017 08:37 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >>>[Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19] On 23/01/2017 (Mon 23:11) Stafford Horne wrote: > >>> > >>>[...] > >>> > >>>> > >>>>Are all of these builds using the tests from lkp-tests [0]? > >>> > >>>Not using any specific tests, other than compiling allmodconfig and > >>>defconfig. > >>> > >>>> > >>>>If so and no one is working on openrisc toolchain updates I will package up > >>>>a modern toolchain for the cdn [1] and send patches for lkp-test. > >>>> > >>>>If there is something else that needs to be done let me know. > >>>> > >>>>[0] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git > >>>>[1] https://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.5.1/ > >>> > >>>If you could work with Tony (his email is at the bottom of the crosstool > >>>front page in [1]) to get the or32 binutils updated, that would be > >>>great. With all the arch currrently in linux, I pretty much have to > >>>just use what is available from kernel.org as prebuilts. > >>> > >> > >>Different problem, but from the 0day info I thought you might be interested > >>in the following breakage as well (seen in -next). > >> > >>/opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c: In function 'do_adedata': > >>/opt/buildbot/slave/next-next/build/arch/score/kernel/traps.c:185:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables' > >> > >>Reported on kerneltests.org. > > > >Thanks Guenter, > > > >Is this for me of Paul? > > > Paul, sorry. Thanks for the heads up. I'll make an appropriate addition to the score patch. Odd that I didn't see a mail from the 0day bot. Paul. -- > > Guenter >