From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tty tree Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:18:22 +0100 Message-ID: <20170206151822.GA13626@kroah.com> References: <20170206152209.0819e332@canb.auug.org.au> <20170206085105.GB3726@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Sebastian Reichel List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 08:09:16AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 2:51 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 03:22:09PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi Greg, > >> > >> After merging the tty tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > >> failed like this: > >> > >> ERROR: "of_device_uevent_modalias" [drivers/tty/serdev/serdev.ko] undefined! > >> ERROR: "of_device_get_modalias" [drivers/tty/serdev/serdev.ko] undefined! > >> > >> Caused by commit > >> > >> cd6484e1830b ("serdev: Introduce new bus for serial attached devices") > >> > >> I have used the tty tree from next-20170203 for today. > > > > Ugh, how has this been passing the 0-day bot builds succesfully? > > > > Rob, any ideas? > > It didn't, but we happened to already have a fix queued up for 4.11. > The fix is in your usb-next branch: > > commit 7a3b7cd332db08546f3cdd984f11773e0d1999e7 > Author: Stephen Boyd > Date: Wed Dec 28 14:56:48 2016 -0800 > > of: device: Export of_device_{get_modalias, uvent_modalias} to modules > > The ULPI bus can be built as a module, and it will soon be > calling these functions when it supports probing devices from DT. > Export them so they can be used by the ULPI module. > > Acked-by: Rob Herring > Cc: > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen Ah, so the if this is pulled into linux-next at the same time, then there's no build error. Stephen, do you need/want me to cherry-pick this into the tty branch, or is it ok as-is? thanks, greg k-h