From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 17:59:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170209015934.GA135772@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170209120839.50a8cfdb@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:08:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: "of_flash_probe_versatile" [drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "of_flash_probe_gemini" [drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.ko] undefined!
>
> Probably caused by commit
>
> 56ff337ea433 ("mtd: physmap_of: add a hook for Gemini flash probing")
>
> The config has:
>
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP=m
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_COMPAT=y
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF=m
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE=y
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI=y
>
> I am not sure why this is a problem, but previously physmap_of_versatile.o
> would have been in obj-m and it is now in obj-y.
I think this part of that change does it:
--- a/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
@@ -18,9 +18,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_TSUNAMI) += tsunami_flash.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PXA2XX) += pxa2xx-flash.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP) += physmap.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF) += physmap_of.o
-ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE
-obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF) += physmap_of_versatile.o
-endif
+obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE) += physmap_of_versatile.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI) += physmap_of_gemini.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PISMO) += pismo.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PMC_MSP_EVM) += pmcmsp-flash.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PCMCIA) += pcmciamtd.o
We were previously just keeping physmap_of_versatile in sync with physmap_of.
So it could be a module, even though CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE was
'bool'.
This is kind of a weird scenario, since physmap_of actually depends on
*_versatile or *_gemini (when enabled). Maybe we should revert to something
like the original logic. We can even actually merge the 3 modules (and then
drop the EXPORT_*s too):
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
index 2fec1e0c2371..aef1846b4de2 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
@@ -17,9 +17,13 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_CK804XROM) += ck804xrom.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_TSUNAMI) += tsunami_flash.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PXA2XX) += pxa2xx-flash.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP) += physmap.o
+ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE
+physmap_of-objs += physmap_of_versatile.o
+endif
+ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI
+physmap_of-objs += physmap_of_gemini.o
+endif
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF) += physmap_of.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE) += physmap_of_versatile.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI) += physmap_of_gemini.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PISMO) += pismo.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PMC_MSP_EVM) += pmcmsp-flash.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PCMCIA) += pcmciamtd.o
I'll cook that into a proper patch if it seems good.
> I have used the version fo the l2-mtd tree from next-20170208 for today.
Sounds good.
Brian
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-09 1:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-09 1:08 linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-02-09 1:59 ` Brian Norris [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-08-28 2:19 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-28 22:06 ` Brian Norris
2016-07-19 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-19 1:20 ` Brian Norris
2016-07-19 1:46 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-12-21 5:47 Stephen Rothwell
2015-09-30 5:16 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-22 5:30 Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-26 17:42 ` Brian Norris
2014-05-26 23:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2014-05-27 10:40 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2014-05-27 22:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-12 0:14 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-12 4:51 ` Dinh Nguyen
2012-10-18 0:28 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-18 9:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-07 2:58 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-07 8:02 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-06 1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2012-02-06 9:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-02-06 21:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170209015934.GA135772@google.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).