From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: linux-next: unsigned commit in the rcu tree Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:18:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20170326231813.GZ3637@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170327003327.3d5bf230@canb.auug.org.au> <20170326162204.GX3637@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170327094549.1868c8e5@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:35254 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751576AbdCZXSm (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:18:42 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098414.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.20/8.16.0.20) with SMTP id v2QNDiiD098278 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:18:16 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 29dmpgv1tu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:18:15 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:18:15 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170327094549.1868c8e5@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:45:49AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 09:22:04 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:33:27AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Paul, > > > > > > Commit 08b35b89141a ("fixup! srcu: Create a tiny SRCU") has not > > > Signed-off-by tag at all :-( > > > > > > Please do not put commits in your linux-next included branch that are > > > not signed. > > > > I should have done the rebase before pushing, which I have now done. > > Please accept my apologies for the noise! > > Now worries, but I think you forgot to push (i.e. that commit is still > the top of the rcu tree as I see it) ... Quite right! I just pushed the new branch. Thanx, Paul