From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: unsigned commits in the kvm tree Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:01:06 +1100 Message-ID: <20170330220106.5e96f825@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20170330092142.4ec22c6a@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:50587 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932541AbdC3LBK (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 07:01:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , Gleb Natapov , KVM , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Radim =?UTF-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Hi Paolo, On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 11:40:41 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 30/03/2017 00:21, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > I noticed that several commits in the kvm tree > > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git#linux-next) today have > > no Signed-off-by for their committer :-( > > Hmm, that must have happened because I rebased them before (testing and) > pushing to kvm/next; kvm/next does not rebase but kvm/queue does. > > Still, it's weird because I have done that many times and it's the first > time you noticed. Do you have scripts for that or did you just happen > to notice? Or maybe there is a difference in what "git rebase" vs. "git > rebase -i" does to the committer email, or something obscure like that. I should write a script, but at the moment I just notice sometimes. I have a quick look at what is new in each tree each morning and sometimes things stick out :-) -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell