From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux-Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Brijesh Singh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:02:08 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180129150208.4073e973@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801171353100.1777@nanos>
Hi all,
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:53:26 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2018, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:23:17 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> > > No. Keep it and lets next time coordinate the relevant bits and pieces
> > > better. I reserve that bit 20 and let Linus sort out the trivial conflict
> > > when merging the stuff.
> >
> > I just picked that bit 20 when resolving the conflict. The original patch used
> > bit 11, so the resolution could use any other sensible bit.
>
> 20 is fine :)
So maybe this (X86_FEATURE_SEV) should be fixed up to use "( 7*32+20)" in
the kvm tree? (Just a followup patch changing the value/position in the
file would be fine).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-29 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 3:48 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 11:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 12:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-17 12:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17 12:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-01-29 4:02 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2018-01-29 10:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-10 1:31 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-13 6:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-06-09 0:33 Stephen Rothwell
2022-05-13 3:53 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-30 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-22 4:29 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-17 2:56 linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02 2:36 Stephen Rothwell
2020-04-02 8:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-02 10:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-01-24 2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:10 Stephen Rothwell
2019-05-17 1:04 Stephen Rothwell
2019-03-04 2:50 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-18 2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 4:24 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-15 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06 5:21 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-04 7:04 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-05 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 10:47 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 13:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-01 14:05 ` Christoffer Dall
2018-02-01 14:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-01 15:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2018-02-01 15:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-02-02 0:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-02-02 17:22 ` Radim Krčmář
2018-01-25 21:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-25 4:34 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-04 6:04 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-27 4:50 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 7:25 Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-02-09 6:11 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02 5:05 Stephen Rothwell
2015-02-02 5:03 Stephen Rothwell
2013-03-01 2:51 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-07 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
2013-02-02 5:52 Stephen Rothwell
2012-09-12 4:33 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-06 5:12 Stephen Rothwell
2010-05-13 3:43 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-27 16:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-11-06 0:21 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01 4:57 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-01 7:10 ` Davide Libenzi
[not found] ` <4A4B1106.8000506@redhat.com>
2009-07-01 12:30 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-07-01 15:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-07-01 12:31 ` Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180129150208.4073e973@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).