From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the s390 tree
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 07:53:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20180205075318.32ef7fd4@mschwideX1>
References: <20180203130348.74f7b89b@canb.auug.org.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180203130348.74f7b89b@canb.auug.org.au>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>, Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

Hi Stephen,

On Sat, 3 Feb 2018 13:03:48 +1100
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Commits
> 
>   a39892ed47bf ("s390/runtime_instrumentation: re-add signum system call parameter")
>   279d2cea3aad ("s390/cio: fix kernel-doc usage")
> 
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.

Thanks for the heads up, fixed it.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.