From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the jc_docs tree Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 09:15:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20180321091554.2b38ee57@gandalf.local.home> References: <20180321153127.23737f6e@canb.auug.org.au> <20180321153715.3a571e5b@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180321153715.3a571e5b@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Jonathan Corbet , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Changbin Du , Tom Zanussi List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:37:15 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 15:31:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got a conflict in: > > > > Documentation/trace/ftrace.txt > > (converted to Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst) > > There was another conflict involving > > Documentation/trace/events.{txt,rst} > > Unfortunately, I accidentally deleted the report email before sending > it :-( > Ug yeah. All the histogram code was ripped out of the events.txt and a new file was created called histogram.txt. I'm guessing that should also be converted into an .rst file. -- Steve