From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the xfs tree
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:54:24 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180322175424.032cf417@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1391 bytes --]
Hi Dan,
Today's linux-next merge of the nvdimm tree got a conflict in:
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
between commit:
f5c54717bf2b ("xfs: remove xfs_zero_range")
from the xfs tree and commit:
6ea4108852e9 ("xfs: prepare xfs_break_layouts() for another layout type")
from the nvdimm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index 132d8aa2afc4,6951d57aae71..000000000000
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@@ -443,6 -457,12 +457,8 @@@ enum xfs_prealloc_flags
int xfs_update_prealloc_flags(struct xfs_inode *ip,
enum xfs_prealloc_flags flags);
-int xfs_zero_eof(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t offset,
- xfs_fsize_t isize, bool *did_zeroing);
-int xfs_zero_range(struct xfs_inode *ip, xfs_off_t pos, xfs_off_t count,
- bool *did_zero);
+ int xfs_break_layouts(struct inode *inode, uint *iolock,
+ enum layout_break_reason reason);
/* from xfs_iops.c */
extern void xfs_setup_inode(struct xfs_inode *ip);
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2018-03-22 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-22 6:54 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-01 8:58 linux-next: manual merge of the nvdimm tree with the xfs tree Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-01 17:16 ` Dan Williams
2018-06-02 0:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2018-06-02 1:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-02 3:37 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180322175424.032cf417@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox