linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the vfs tree
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:56:05 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180619145605.1eb8e86f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the userns tree got conflicts in:

  fs/proc/inode.c
  fs/proc/root.c

between commits:

  0223e0999be2 ("procfs: Move proc_fill_super() to fs/proc/root.c")
  83cd45075c36 ("proc: Add fs_context support to procfs")

from the vfs tree and commit:

  cc8cda3af2ba ("proc: Simplify and fix proc by removing the kernel mount")

from the userns tree.

I don't know how to fix this up, so I just dropped the userns tree for
today (since it only contained that one commit).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-19  4:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-19  4:56 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2018-06-19 10:11 ` linux-next: manual merge of the userns tree with the vfs tree Eric W. Biederman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-20  2:39 Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06  7:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-08-06 17:35   ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-06-20  1:44 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-20  3:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2015-05-25  9:49 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-16  3:21 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-16  4:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2014-12-10  6:27 Stephen Rothwell
2014-12-10  6:21 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  6:50 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  6:50 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  6:49 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-08  6:49 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180619145605.1eb8e86f@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).