From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the rdma tree Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 14:05:12 +1000 Message-ID: <20180710140512.53d67d40@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20180710113342.605e53e8@canb.auug.org.au> <20180710034157.GA17400@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/AXPEU1Cs7but9NPo_7FPSCJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180710034157.GA17400@mellanox.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Gunthorpe Cc: Doug Ledford , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bart Van Assche List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Sig_/AXPEU1Cs7but9NPo_7FPSCJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Jason, On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 21:41:57 -0600 Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >=20 > What compiler is producing these? I got nothing from 0-day build > service or my local gcc-7.. The x86 compiler is a v7.3.1 cross compiler hosted on PowerPC LE and built from sources. > They are false positives and I guess we need to put the > uninitialized_var back that was hiding them. Rats. :-( > Also curious that the powerpc compiler gets a different set.. The powerpc builds are done with: $ gcc --version gcc (Debian 7.3.0-21) 7.3.0 --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/AXPEU1Cs7but9NPo_7FPSCJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAltEMHgACgkQAVBC80lX 0GzmKAf/TQ3jI1F/1ppuDloSvl/wgPT7Nibra2HbZlIMH9o8td31xB4GGw7TcqIp hVjnMsAL385tLSIWvztmM9qdIsmDWQAOeJus4Sdsx4vqO4DhXvA7EHa9bu3P8S4O DsVmrQPAWF9/N1QEFEcVVZh84mBP6zgyY/hzsmbq2JahN5JWHdkz4/oixcaQhQbQ TEG+uo+xtmHyLXE2s5pLaTsfYQ87BGCxwr+ASn+X44BcIVI4hTfoS0fTqDDIG9bT sCciBRYE016sXuxpgQWWBGt7D1K9Db0mHs/PWcVtXBQ+2VlJXi4dcxiih3zuxzaA aW4TEPVrNwzHxtXD+dVuQ/P0IiRHhA== =Du4I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/AXPEU1Cs7but9NPo_7FPSCJ--