From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the iommu tree Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 12:58:13 +0200 Message-ID: <20180711105813.GA18417@kroah.com> References: <20180711131445.7e1e211b@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180711131445.7e1e211b@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Joerg Roedel , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Rob Herring , Jacopo Mondi , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 01:14:45PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in: > > drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c > > between commits: > > 0b8ac1409641 ("iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Hook up r8a7796 DT matching code") > 3701c123e1c1 ("iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Hook up r8a779(70|95) DT matching code") > 98dbffd39a65 ("iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Hook up R8A77965 DT matching code") > > from the iommu tree and commit: > > ac6bbf0cdf42 ("iommu: Remove IOMMU_OF_DECLARE") > > from the driver-core tree. > > I fixed it up (I removed the new IOMMU_OF_DECLARE() lines) and can > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. Resolution seems sane to me, thanks. greg k-h