From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: linux-next: commits in the cisco tree Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:24:19 +1000 Message-ID: <20180930112419.6f880e46@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_//qGmaqsFQ5PMLlsRT=QHVJ8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Walker Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org --Sig_//qGmaqsFQ5PMLlsRT=QHVJ8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniel, I noticed that you have added some commits to the cisco tree today. Just a= couple of comments: Fristly, commits 734245aec283 ("This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin co= mmand line." and b17f223f16f2 ("This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin co= mmand line.") are identical (though in different branches). Secondly, commits 2c070709ea75 ("his updates the x86 code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE= ") a5c4647c26da ("This updates the powerpc code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CM= DLINE") have no Acked-by or Reviewed-by from the repspective architecture maintainers/developers. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_//qGmaqsFQ5PMLlsRT=QHVJ8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAluwJcMACgkQAVBC80lX 0GzQ5wf/XmpLoVLGS+Fg31oFfgiUGBilsDrDifnKe9krSvv0JaA8GuXhOzNdW/a6 gMOYFLE2xz7inMOr7D5sokjGZR2hHYANscl002qXzeyIwnO7jNthsLPsUQppK66j sGuP0iD53c7sdo55AoEOfvK7FcRw0syr/ZAJgwV+NUedRi8d5dbMkyLhKFPsdbsm +nb3FL1h3ly2aWaK1psUo3RRQM0ZIHQoz75jD5+VLFcECNwzndYeg6PCMXOQ+fFX s59VsPSubOa0pKEHqJULFPEm09cR0dXVDHh32cnFUDiQKF9tt/Uy9gcjV3ZHKQ+l ivgHXJegY1bq4GR5X9lpCLpjYU6Kmw== =88q2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//qGmaqsFQ5PMLlsRT=QHVJ8--