From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [GIT PULL linux-next] Add Compiler Attributes tree Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 09:00:47 -0400 Message-ID: <20181003090047.5aa88fc4@gandalf.local.home> References: <20181003071059.02b3fd6f@canb.auug.org.au> <20181002223652.GA4290@nautica> <20181003090010.5150f914@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Dominique Martinet , Nick Desaulniers , Andrew Morton , Greg KH , Linux-Next Mailing List , Andreas Dilger , Masahiro Yamada , Michal Marek , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Olof Johansson , Konstantin Ryabitsev , David Miller , Andrey Ryabinin , Kees Cook , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Paul Lawrence List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 14:34:28 +0200 Miguel Ojeda wrote: > When I sent the first email, I assumed that changes in -next were > supposed to be clean -- my mistake, but please document somewhere how > -next works! Specially that you are rerere'ing conflicts and > re-resolving them every day. Yes, a document in the Documentation directory on how to work with linux-next may be a good idea. Something we can point people to when they start using linux-next. I know there was something in the initial email, but I've lost that. -- Steve