From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 16
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:32:54 -0800
Message-ID: <20190117183254.GA17361@roeck-us.net>
References: <20190116173838.042db659@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20190116203547.GA788@roeck-us.net>
 <20190117084902.GA20220@ming.t460p>
 <20190117103553.GB23565@ming.t460p>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190117103553.GB23565@ming.t460p>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 06:35:55PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Guenter,
> > 
> > Could you share me the .config?
> 
Any 32 bit configuration from affected architectures should work.

> From your dmesg log, looks the test is run on i386, so please
> feel free to try the following patch:
> 
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=154772088110800&w=2
> 
Is this still relevant ? Today's image is fine.

Thanks,
Guenter