From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 6 (drivers/edac/skx* and i10nm) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2019 22:22:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20190206212218.GJ7314@zn.tnic> References: <20190206170000.286b1f53@canb.auug.org.au> <3f095f3e-ace0-aadb-ead1-01908da5c08c@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3f095f3e-ace0-aadb-ead1-01908da5c08c@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Tony Luck , Linux Edac Mailing List List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 01:11:23PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > CONFIG_EDAC_I10NM=y > but CONFIG_EDAC_SKX is not set. > since # CONFIG_ACPI is not set > > Should EDAC_I10NM depend on ACPI also? This should do it: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bp/bp.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=d6a9f7336d925364daca00557afa59a68e78b422 -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.