From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Block <bblock@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Steffen Maier <maier@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Boot hangs 3 minutes with device mapper on s390
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 13:30:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190301183050.GA29752@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190301183350.5ff697d4@TP-holzheu>
On Fri, Mar 01 2019 at 12:33pm -0500,
Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Fedora 29, the following "linux-next" commit introduced a regression on s390:
>
> commit 1efa3bb79d3de8ca1b7f6770313a1fc0bebe25c7
> Author: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri Feb 22 11:23:01 2019 -0500
>
> dm: must allocate dm_noclone for stacked noclone devices
>
> Otherwise various lvm2 testsuite tests fail because the lower layers of
> the stacked noclone device aren't updated to allocate a new 'struct
> dm_clone' that reflects the upper layer bio that was issued to it.
>
> Fixes: 97a89458020b38 ("dm: improve noclone bio support")
> Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
>
> With this commit the boot hangs three minutes on a z/VM system with the
> following device mapper setup:
>
> # dmsetup ls --tree
> mpathe (252:5)
> ├─ (8:128)
> └─ (8:144)
> mpathd (252:4)
> ├─ (8:96)
> └─ (8:112)
> mpathc (252:3)
> ├─ (8:64)
> └─ (8:80)
> mpathb (252:2)
> ├─ (8:32)
> └─ (8:48)
> mpatha1 (252:1)
> └─mpatha (252:0)
> ├─ (8:16)
> └─ (8:0)
>
> On the console we get messages like the following:
>
> 10.116863 sd 3:0:0:1083719813: sdj Write Protect is off
> 10.117170 sd 3:0:0:1083719813: sdj Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> 10.130562 sd 3:0:0:1083719813: sdj Attached SCSI disk
> A start job is running for udev Wai Device Initialization (6s / 3min)
> A start job is running for udev Wai Device Initialization (6s / 3min)
> A start job is running for udev Wai Device Initialization (7s / 3min)
> A start job is running for udev Wai Device Initialization (7s / 3min)
> A start job is running for udev Wai Device Initialization (8s / 3min)
> ...
>
> After three minutes the boot process continues and the system comes.
>
> As kernel config we used "performance_defconfig" (make performance_defconfig).
I'm struggling to see why this particular change would cause such a boot
stall -- but then resolve itself.
Can you provide the output from 'dmsetup table'?
Multipath defaults to blk-mq (request-based). The change you've called
into question is related to bio-based DM. So There must be some
bio-based DM layer ontop of the multipath devices. Is mpatha1 a
dm-linear device layered ontop of multipath?
Thanks,
Mike
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-01 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20190301183350.5ff697d4@TP-holzheu>
2019-03-01 18:30 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2019-03-04 10:01 ` linux-next: Boot hangs 3 minutes with device mapper on s390 Steffen Maier
2019-03-04 10:03 ` Michael Holzheu
2019-03-05 4:03 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-03-05 9:46 ` Mikulas Patocka
2019-03-05 13:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-03-05 18:02 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-03-05 22:21 ` bio-based DM's "noclone" changes have been dropped from 5.1 [was: Re: linux-next: Boot hangs 3 minutes with device mapper on s390] Mike Snitzer
2019-03-07 10:18 ` Michael Holzheu
[not found] ` <alpine.LRH.2.02.1903011516160.20592@file01.intranet.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com>
2019-03-01 20:30 ` linux-next: Boot hangs 3 minutes with device mapper on s390 Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190301183050.GA29752@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=bblock@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=holzheu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maier@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox