From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lee Jones Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 27 (sunxi clk & mfd) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 11:02:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20190403100204.GL11301@dell> References: <20190327145020.2fff97b8@canb.auug.org.au> <641a04ec-e2e6-4263-e77e-d272058c18c9@infradead.org> <20190328095036.734adbba@canb.auug.org.au> <20190401102732.GD4187@dell> <20190401223624.6b4f8c42@canb.auug.org.au> <20190401123337.2nhppxyl5nzyofub@flea> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190401123337.2nhppxyl5nzyofub@flea> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Randy Dunlap , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Boris Brezillon , Chen-Yu Tsai List-Id: linux-next.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 01 Apr 2019, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 10:36:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:27:32 +0100 Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > I reported that a while ago (x86_64 allmodconfig after the merge of the > > > > sunxi tree). Apparently there is a fix out there but it hasn't been > > > > applied yet. > > > > > > Where is the fix to be applied? SUNXI or MFD? > > > > Well, I only see the problem after applying the sunxi tree (which > > happens before I merge the mfd tree). > > > > Maxime said: > > > > > I've just sent a patch fixing this: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190322091650.5189-1-maxime.ripard@bootlin.com/ > > > > So maybe if you (Lee) acked it, Maxime could apply it to the sunxi > > tree, so we keep the breakage and fix together? Assuming that the fix > > is acceptable (and works :-)). > > That works for me That patch has been applied in my -fixes branch, so should be repaired before it breaks. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog