From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [-next] system hangs likely due to "modules: Only return -EEXIST for modules that have finished loading"
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 07:55:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190429055520.GA3665@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6a69074a-e913-3b67-feef-9b62a7400f8a@redhat.com>
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 06:42:51AM -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> On 4/27/19 6:24 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> > index 410eeb7e4f1d..48748cfec991 100644
> > --- a/kernel/module.c
> > +++ b/kernel/module.c
> > @@ -3585,6 +3585,7 @@ again:
> > finished_loading(mod->name));
> > if (err)
> > goto out_unlocked;
> > + cond_resched();
> Heiko, I'm testing on 2-cpu systems which appear to show the problem ~10% of the
> time. On another system I backed out my original patch to set a baseline, and
> noticed that occasionally the time to boot the system doubles from ~4 seconds to
> 9 seconds. Is this something you're also concerned with?
This _could_ be an issue, since I see the problem much more likely to
happen on systems with many devices (where many means only something
like 10 block devices). As far as I can tell it looks like
systemd/udevd tries to modprobe at the s390-trng module for each(!)
device.
I have no idea why it is doing that... however given that (failed)
module handling now sometimes takes more time, this might become a
real issue on system with several 1000s of block devices, which is a
realistic scenario at least on s390.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-29 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-26 13:07 [-next] system hangs likely due to "modules: Only return -EEXIST for modules that have finished loading" Heiko Carstens
2019-04-26 13:22 ` Prarit Bhargava
2019-04-26 15:07 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-04-26 16:09 ` Jessica Yu
2019-04-26 17:15 ` Prarit Bhargava
2019-04-26 18:10 ` Prarit Bhargava
2019-04-26 19:45 ` Prarit Bhargava
2019-04-27 0:20 ` Prarit Bhargava
2019-04-27 10:24 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-04-27 10:35 ` Prarit Bhargava
2019-04-27 10:42 ` Prarit Bhargava
2019-04-29 5:55 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190429055520.GA3665@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).