From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19547C5ACAE for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC04D2075C for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727093AbfIKOVU (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:21:20 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:39338 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726341AbfIKOVU (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:21:20 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x8BEEEsR015982 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:21:19 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uy1y01rjf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:21:18 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:21:17 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:21:14 +0100 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x8BELD0W35062012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:21:13 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7A45206C; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:21:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.148.207.74]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85A0552054; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:21:10 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:21:07 +0100 From: Mike Rapoport To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Mike Rapoport , Chester Lin Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm tree References: <20190911001459.6ccc76ee@canb.auug.org.au> <20190910142128.GR13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190910142128.GR13294@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19091114-4275-0000-0000-000003647F66 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19091114-4276-0000-0000-00003876D745 Message-Id: <20190911142106.GA6429@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-09-11_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1909110133 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 03:21:28PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > This is correctly signed off, but Mike didn't send the patch correctly. > It missed a From: line for the proper author, so the patch was committed > as if Mike had authored it, which he didn't. Sorry about that, haven't used the patch system for couple of years now. Would you like me to resubmit the patch? > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:14:59AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Commit > > > > 2505b9ba9c37 ("ARM: 8904/1: skip nomap memblocks while finding the lowmem/highmem boundary") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its author. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Stephen Rothwell > > > > -- > RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ > FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up > According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up -- Sincerely yours, Mike.