From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF5ACA9EAE for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B045120717 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="LGn7WKNp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728902AbfJ2QRs (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:17:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:39558 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389902AbfJ2QRs (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:17:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id p12so9922885pgn.6 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:17:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ypAwiKuKsi5Io6NuqvL960KV+GmDoJ6Gn0TIbiqmcYU=; b=LGn7WKNpse2FeLQC/MT4ePdMT/qHVlyGo8T/ae3O/DKn8MUdIEK8IpkBh/rNosUcF+ z2euOhk/biVxYuEWROhbhjPNeW1V5Z674R+KxYR/LsYqtE8pjeAgFsAZZF4MY5QpT/Rz hd6KoLTzGCIW5iTDycjM7AvDR/UG/a3cYN59U= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ypAwiKuKsi5Io6NuqvL960KV+GmDoJ6Gn0TIbiqmcYU=; b=A/xaAVADhyuf5A5uuv5S9TmW3tiSjK4xnYnvp1vBWFy5VreQzkVZC9Gz9Js870n5/b euVZufLpGN3A/naZpg5ZOZK+e2wTPdi1kkPhWkCQnaKKFRGoLXP/BoyAbyFD9wBxir9I LdukBoxz14QFOiYjeZjJlEo0sCKzQjl/U8VMkHa4Wxh/9AOOP644FbWQ5VZnOKeYN0Aw 1HLKmfwMQm9S5qM5ETRIUmZcc1/UYDglJGlghEQpPoOdynMYOBiGdYDApsJgs+Bl2vbm 6/IAdWyoL4CRJZglUjuUOyVXh/Jub0ZLcM4OcrylzBeUV07/lSUuygGKCRD2m1eYzHvd 0WXw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVgC2t2GiGox2tp0fmUcQMuhWWZDnm6fhfF3bp8aaq/UPQxsyqc SeKX+sMr2mUgUx+OFEVvjWgEXQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyhMMyzfGJQyAHwXHnN0h/ulxU8eXa3gzz9VvU6d6DeL+C5rLK+X65X9LLX9C6RJ01ozBT1gw== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e145:: with SMTP id h5mr28723563pgk.447.1572365867431; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm13451196pgj.4.2019.10.29.09.17.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:17:45 -0700 From: Kees Cook To: Amit Kucheria Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Colin King , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Daniel Lezcano , Linux-Next Subject: Re: Coverity: calibrate_8976(): Memory - illegal accesses Message-ID: <201910290916.087AA12F@keescook> References: <201910281603.E90E9627A@keescook> <0451f7e8-ff96-f411-ed26-1310999be3c5@embeddedor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:37:57PM +0530, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:30 PM Kees Cook wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 5:08 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This one has been addressed already: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAK7fi1a8CiX=HVqhZSmQJdcjF1X_kdHFDwJhEpYJUcdPTcbMQA@mail.gmail.com/ > > > > > > > Ah-ha, excellent. Colin, do you want me to CC you on these automatic > > reports too? > > > > Hi Kees, > > Is coverity being run just on linux-next or on mainline too? I've > noticed it found at least one error that has existed for a long-time > only when that code was moved around. There is another public Coverity scan that runs the -rcX releases. Dave Jones tends to operate that one, and I haven't attached any tooling to that one. I wanted to see how noisy running against linux-next was first... -- Kees Cook