From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347E0C432C3 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1761020728 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727421AbfKONs3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:48:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36126 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727417AbfKONs3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:48:29 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 81E8E20715; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 13:48:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:48:27 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Mark Rutland Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the arm64 tree Message-ID: <20191115084827.6e04ec9f@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20191115122513.GB41572@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20191115135357.10386fac@canb.auug.org.au> <20191115122513.GB41572@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:25:14 +0000 Mark Rutland wrote: > Thanks Stephen! > > Steven (Rostedt), what's your preference for handling this? > > We can drop revert the arm64 change to vmlinux.lds.h for now (and I can > send it as a subsequent cleanup), or you could merge my > arm64/ftrace-with-regs branch and fix this up in the ftrace tree. Or we can just make a note of this, and mention it in our pull requests to Linus. We could make a single branch where we merged the two branches, fix it up (as I believe Stephen did it correctly) and tell Linus "here's the fix up". This is a common occurrence and Linus has no problems with this. As long as he's given a heads up. -- Steve