public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the keys tree
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 12:25:30 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200129122530.7d4659f6@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210105037.085b3418@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1513 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:50:37 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the selinux tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   59336b0f8000 ("smack: Implement the watch_key and post_notification hooks")
> 
> from the keys tree and commit:
> 
>   59438b46471a ("security,lockdown,selinux: implement SELinux lockdown")
> 
> from the selinux tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> index 734d67889826,99d629fd9944..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_audit.h
> @@@ -74,7 -74,7 +74,8 @@@ struct common_audit_data 
>   #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_FILE	12
>   #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IBPKEY	13
>   #define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IBENDPORT 14
>  -#define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_LOCKDOWN 15
>  +#define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_NOTIFICATION 15
> ++#define LSM_AUDIT_DATA_LOCKDOWN 16
>   	union 	{
>   		struct path path;
>   		struct dentry *dentry;

This is now a conflict between the keys tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-29  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-09 23:50 linux-next: manual merge of the selinux tree with the keys tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-12-09 23:55 ` Paul Moore
2020-01-29  1:25 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-01-29  2:28   ` Paul Moore
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-11 23:35 Stephen Rothwell
2020-02-12  2:03 ` Paul Moore
2020-02-12 12:03 ` Richard Haines
2020-02-13 23:02   ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200129122530.7d4659f6@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox