From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3098C2D0DB for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FF9205ED for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="BusKtRyq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726856AbgA2Xzo (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:55:44 -0500 Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:57089 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726648AbgA2Xzo (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jan 2020 18:55:44 -0500 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 487L305zq0z9s29; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:55:40 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1580342142; bh=tgC0XCu5sJjdp7keIzOjDIZLm8jl3OfcV5uW9ev8uR0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=BusKtRyqT/RhUD6liA9jHULVhJpMDSqDRNJa8izS95+sXWZG3FWKz02MOmniw396T OeJc6SvxKouBEBZ5SzoTTgjJLqaQbZMgWPkxG+QZhb2mbGiM12gotglbj+TFzcX3UN Mfvo+LqefxTea5Ks9513xPnRQAGA+qND9o4KRhTuEyUujpFpHBFGXhf6Zp0ipZKMOm a11tkOyX2aa9Lch7qbJ19bCa9gEljRS2ZxR1b57k1M3L7EgoQfFZCHUyK4ASBtJGBi szXeqSRsGqYOq7cTgx5BF9tIMvK3YHYlqIOn96iK+RgGbPE14qXzN8JQti//vgAdPs VdK/g9SbwSThA== Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:55:38 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Miller , Networking , Johannes Berg Subject: linux-next: the nfc-next tree seems to be old Message-ID: <20200130105538.7b07b150@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/rT9R.nc+iQmvEO+FTdpSqU."; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/rT9R.nc+iQmvEO+FTdpSqU. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Samuel, I noticed that the nfc-next tree has not changed since June 2018 and has been orphaned in May 2019, so am wondering if the commits in it are still relevant or should I just remove the tree from linux-next. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/rT9R.nc+iQmvEO+FTdpSqU. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl4yG3sACgkQAVBC80lX 0GxP1gf/QLVqOstMt03A5P3vqBe+E7KT8eKT4gKwAz4HyPMrnG3eNpOELmBD1hUi aZCY7Fqt2oKoDgIF1GFO9mxs8RuLmqQZiN9r1uKzGGOZdDoQwxncEZrKVCJjI0go GL3f+zizKgaTo2nZr7yjrpvfGAaq9bAKlMT0EcQVghCxSE1Ob9lztw/qD6puFNwo nrJMogkld3aYucyJDxSaC57xSfLNtUj7zv2B9VwUp06ku6LjbYvWD1ixWi1NW0SY 0bYDz1IpN4u/KMeCH6Gk5BaT2XsSpvjx5KOIZJwNo6QPDOhEFiN45HJ0Bp5tYk5j f0RMVwvuRt98RMASPvi+skJgy4YJjQ== =KaQf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/rT9R.nc+iQmvEO+FTdpSqU.--