From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AC0C433E1 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B71207DA for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727792AbgHTNBz (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:01:55 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:44475 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729033AbgHTJkl (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 05:40:41 -0400 IronPort-SDR: ZLFWryVtWQ2sbvEQWyNXSFbHoj79jmR0bGsufnMp9JmdvE+ZmSEwEodLn1QOxUonp9DqZMRRbR ClI/Kr3sJi9A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9718"; a="240093999" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,332,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="240093999" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Aug 2020 02:40:38 -0700 IronPort-SDR: E40CW/24bwrXLELWjiM6ePuqcHQIEYJyWgdOpngCph/tENCwJFg+8CovzvyYfMS1FKZoIu8e0O nlaEONdqORFQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,332,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="327377344" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Aug 2020 02:40:37 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k8h3k-00A50Z-2Y; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:40:36 +0300 Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:40:36 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl-intel tree Message-ID: <20200820094036.GU1891694@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20200820113039.71120e6a@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200820113039.71120e6a@canb.auug.org.au> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:30:39AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the pinctrl-intel tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > x86_64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.o: in function `byt_pinctrl_probe': > pinctrl-baytrail.c:(.text+0x12bf): undefined reference to `intel_pinctrl_get_soc_data' > > Caused by commit > > 2db97df9f29d ("pinctrl: baytrail: Switch to use intel_pinctrl_get_soc_data()") Right, I have updated it. Shouldn't be issues now. > CONFIG_PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL=y > CONFIG_PINCTRL_INTEL=m > > I have ised the pinctrl-intel tree from next-20200819 for today. Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko