From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62BFC2BB84 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4145321941 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 20:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="J6dqbtMr" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727017AbgIPR0z (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:26:55 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:52472 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727061AbgIPR0u (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:26:50 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0187473.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08GG3DLS131847; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:28:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=pp1; bh=TJr0qkDghNCPG6hPr3uEVka0fh005kVOuX9Xz33kY1g=; b=J6dqbtMrG5mf72dDY+tt6Ib4ZbLg232Gsq2pMEIeI1r99kRHMlYDCm8+PRvkFVNQSOwJ jziGTKMsizgpZvHiV+oDIidyJdF6lYiu0dC2IbD6A0lc+mUUS0jsztfNS6mTM3zg+OFm bNWZm0T3oKcp17Axu+3kdQi/OrU2B8LQX0jJOSE7gNpL2cV0UtGDuuFTscwaqfvuSHQe BGRDgIJg6V3kzfpO7jKL9R2YJXUjbdPuilf5Lxp8CUZyGiQT0yD1IV5J9vQMrNdyr9SP qt/tg3ruLsF0sW43IL+5SGnTSFPTmH+o20VpJJjgiJ6gwNIXT36mLM4LTkAGy+n2lF9z 3A== Received: from ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (6a.4a.5195.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [149.81.74.106]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 33knv40mw7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:28:53 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 08GGSXgq029463; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:28:51 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma04fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 33k64s8eh9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:28:51 +0000 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 08GGSmMO29360544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:28:48 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A44AE045; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:28:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E31EAE04D; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:28:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.171.80.23]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:28:48 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:28:46 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: add s390 set_fs branch? Message-ID: <20200916162846.GE7076@osiris> References: <20200915155534.GA11180@osiris> <20200916095437.77e7365d@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200916095437.77e7365d@canb.auug.org.au> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.235,18.0.687 definitions=2020-09-16_10:2020-09-16,2020-09-16 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 phishscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 suspectscore=2 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2006250000 definitions=main-2009160116 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, > > I'm wondering what the best way would be to deal with additional s390 > > specific topic branches and how to get them merged into linux-next? > > > > As far as I can tell other maintainers merge all their branches into a > > 'for-next' branch, so that you only need to pull one branch (and don't > > need to deal with requests like this one ;) ). > > > > Would that the best way for you? If so we could simply do the same for > > s390 as well. Please let us know. > > Yes, normally maintainers merge their topic branches into a single > "for-next" (or similar) branch for me to merge. However, in some cases > I carry separate topic branches. So what ever is easiest. > > I have added the set_fs branch today (I called it s390-setfs). If this > is going to be short lived (or you decide to do the merge yourself), > please try to remember to tell me to remove it when it is done with. Ok, so we have a "for-next" branch now: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git for-next If you would include that in linux-next then you can drop the following ones: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git#fixes git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git#features git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git#set_fs Thanks a lot!