From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB75C433DB for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF42921D7F for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 13:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727041AbgLVNQM (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:16:12 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:59002 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726958AbgLVNQM (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 08:16:12 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id AC1B267373; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:15:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 14:15:28 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Alasdair G Kergon , Mike Snitzer , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , Jens Axboe , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20201222131528.GA29822@lst.de> References: <20201222095056.7a5ac0a0@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201222095056.7a5ac0a0@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Mike, Hannes, I think this patch is rather harmful. Why does device mapper even mix file system path with a dev_t and all the other weird forms parsed by name_to_dev_t, which was supposed to be be for the early init code where no file system is available. Can we please kick off a proper discussion for this on the linux-block list?