From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DM's filesystem lookup in dm_get_dev_t() [was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with Linus' tree]
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 09:05:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201223080537.GA4974@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <288d1c58-c0e2-9d6f-4816-48c66536fe8b@suse.de>
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 06:24:09PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Ok. The problem from my perspective is that device-mapper needs to
> a) ensure that the arbitrary string passed in with the table definition
> refers to a valid block device
> and
> b) the block device can be opened with O_EXCL, so that device-mapper can
> then use it.
>
> Originally (ie prior to commit 644bda6f3460) dm_get_device() just converted
> the string to a 'dev_t' representation, and then the block device itself
> was checked and opened in dm_get_table_device().
> 'lookup_bdev' was just being used to convert the path if the string was not
> in the canonical major:minor format, as then it was assumed that it
> referred to a block device node, and then lookup_bdev kinda makes sense.
Yes, 644bda6f3460 is the cause of all evil, as it uses an API in a place
where it should not be used. It and the prep patch
(e6e20a7a5f3f49bfee518d5c6849107398d83912) which did the grave mistake
of making name_to_dev_t available outside of the early init code really
need to be reverted.
> However, lookup_bdev() now always recurses into the filesystem, causing
> multipath to stall in an all-paths-down scenario.
lookup_bdev always did a file system lookup, and always only accepted
a valid name in the file system.
> Alternatively, if Mike says that only major:minor is the valid format for a
> table definition we can kill that code completely. But clearly _I_ cannot
> make the call here.
Before 644bda6f3460 the table definitions only accepted a valid name in
the file system. Which is the proper interface.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-23 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-21 22:50 linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-22 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-22 14:53 ` DM's filesystem lookup in dm_get_dev_t() [was: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with Linus' tree] Mike Snitzer
2020-12-22 17:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-23 8:05 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201223080537.GA4974@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).