linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm64 tree
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:03:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210322180329.GA12107@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210322174023.602a110b@canb.auug.org.au>

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:40:23PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   87143f404f33 ("arm64: mm: use XN table mapping attributes for the linear region")
> 
> from the arm64 tree and commit:
> 
>   0a2634348ef8 ("set_memory: allow querying whether set_direct_map_*() is actually enabled")
> 
> from the akpm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

The resolution looks fine. Thanks Stephen.

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-22  6:40 linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-22 18:03 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-07  9:25 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-07 10:29 ` Will Deacon
2021-01-28  8:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30  7:28 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30  7:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-30 11:58   ` Catalin Marinas
2020-11-26  7:06 Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-26  7:25 ` Peter Collingbourne
2020-03-05  5:50 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-05  9:21 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-01-23  5:43 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-07  7:41 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-07  8:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-07  9:25   ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210322180329.GA12107@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).