From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the devicetree tree
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 18:19:45 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210406181945.2ae6fed1@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1445 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in:
drivers/of/property.c
between commit:
3915fed92365 ("of: property: Provide missing member description and remove excess param")
from the devicetree tree and commit:
f7514a663016 ("of: property: fw_devlink: Add support for remote-endpoint")
from the driver-core tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/of/property.c
index 2046ae311322,2bb3158c9e43..000000000000
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@@ -1243,7 -1230,8 +1248,8 @@@ static struct device_node *parse_##fnam
* @parse_prop.prop_name: Name of property holding a phandle value
* @parse_prop.index: For properties holding a list of phandles, this is the
* index into the list
- * @optional: The property can be an optional dependency.
+ * @optional: Describes whether a supplier is mandatory or not
+ * @node_not_dev: The consumer node containing the property is never a device.
*
* Returns:
* parse_prop() return values are
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-06 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-06 8:19 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2021-04-06 9:11 ` linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the devicetree tree Greg KH
2021-04-06 16:19 ` Saravana Kannan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-17 16:19 Mark Brown
2026-03-18 7:37 ` Greg KH
2020-07-06 3:23 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 5:33 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-17 19:58 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210406181945.2ae6fed1@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox