* linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
@ 2021-06-25 9:52 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-25 17:53 ` Daniel Latypov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-06-25 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuah Khan, Brendan Higgins
Cc: Daniel Latypov, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 606 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
lib/kunit/executor.c:26:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
26 | +kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite,
| ^
lib/kunit/executor.c: At top level:
lib/kunit/executor.c:140:10: fatal error: executor_test.c: No such file or directory
140 | #include "executor_test.c"
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by commit
c9d80ffc5a0a ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names")
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
2021-06-25 9:52 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-06-25 17:53 ` Daniel Latypov
2021-06-25 18:12 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Latypov @ 2021-06-25 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Shuah Khan, Brendan Higgins, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 2:52 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> lib/kunit/executor.c:26:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
> 26 | +kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite,
> | ^
> lib/kunit/executor.c: At top level:
> lib/kunit/executor.c:140:10: fatal error: executor_test.c: No such file or directory
> 140 | #include "executor_test.c"
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> c9d80ffc5a0a ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names")
For posterity, David sent out a patch addressing this here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210625111603.358518-1-davidgow@google.com/
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
2021-06-25 17:53 ` Daniel Latypov
@ 2021-06-25 18:12 ` Shuah Khan
2021-06-25 18:46 ` Brendan Higgins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2021-06-25 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Latypov, Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Brendan Higgins, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, David Gow, Shuah Khan
On 6/25/21 11:53 AM, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 2:52 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> lib/kunit/executor.c:26:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
>> 26 | +kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite,
>> | ^
>> lib/kunit/executor.c: At top level:
>> lib/kunit/executor.c:140:10: fatal error: executor_test.c: No such file or directory
>> 140 | #include "executor_test.c"
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>> c9d80ffc5a0a ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names")
>
> For posterity, David sent out a patch addressing this here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210625111603.358518-1-davidgow@google.com/
>
It is all fixed now. When I applied this patch yesterday, I needed to
fix merge conflicts. When I did that the newly added file was left
behind.
Build didn't find it since the file was in the repo. Oh well. So much
for trying to save you a rebase.
Sorry for the trouble. It should all be squared away now. Build and
exec tested it for sanity.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit-fixes&id=1d71307a6f94df3750f8f884545a769e227172fe
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
2021-06-25 18:12 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2021-06-25 18:46 ` Brendan Higgins
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Brendan Higgins @ 2021-06-25 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuah Khan
Cc: Daniel Latypov, Stephen Rothwell, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, David Gow
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:12 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 6/25/21 11:53 AM, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 2:52 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> >> allyesconfig) failed like this:
> >>
> >> lib/kunit/executor.c:26:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '+' token
> >> 26 | +kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite,
> >> | ^
> >> lib/kunit/executor.c: At top level:
> >> lib/kunit/executor.c:140:10: fatal error: executor_test.c: No such file or directory
> >> 140 | #include "executor_test.c"
> >> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >>
> >> Caused by commit
> >>
> >> c9d80ffc5a0a ("kunit: add unit test for filtering suites by names")
> >
> > For posterity, David sent out a patch addressing this here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210625111603.358518-1-davidgow@google.com/
> >
>
> It is all fixed now. When I applied this patch yesterday, I needed to
> fix merge conflicts. When I did that the newly added file was left
> behind.
>
> Build didn't find it since the file was in the repo. Oh well. So much
> for trying to save you a rebase.
>
> Sorry for the trouble. It should all be squared away now. Build and
> exec tested it for sanity.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git/commit/?h=kunit-fixes&id=1d71307a6f94df3750f8f884545a769e227172fe
I just pulled and tested and can confirm it is working for me now.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
@ 2021-06-25 10:05 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-25 11:31 ` David Gow
2021-06-25 15:48 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-06-25 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuah Khan, Brendan Higgins
Cc: David Gow, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 25299 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:9:
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_single_hop_walk':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:455:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
455 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:455:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
455 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:466:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
466 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:466:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
466 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_daisy_chain_walk':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:512:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
512 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:512:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
512 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:523:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
523 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:523:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
523 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_simple_tree_walk':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:573:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
573 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:573:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
573 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:584:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
584 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:584:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
584 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_complex_tree_walk':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:655:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
655 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:655:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
655 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:666:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
666 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:666:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
666 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_max_length_walk':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:756:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
756 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:756:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
756 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:767:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
767 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:767:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
767 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane0':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:850:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
850 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:850:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
850 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:853:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
853 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:853:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
853 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:910:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
910 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:910:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
910 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:913:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
913 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:913:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
913 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:988:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
988 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:988:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
988 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:991:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
991 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:991:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
991 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain_reverse':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1066:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
1066 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1066:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
1066 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1069:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
1069 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1069:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
1069 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_mixed_chain':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1156:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
1156 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1156:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
1156 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1159:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
1159 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1159:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
1159 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_mixed_chain_reverse':
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1246:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
1246 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1246:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
1246 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1249:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
1249 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
| ^~~~
include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1249:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
1249 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by commit
8f0877c26e4b ("thunderbolt: test: Remove some casts which are no longer required")
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
2021-06-25 10:05 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2021-06-25 11:31 ` David Gow
2021-06-25 15:48 ` Shuah Khan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2021-06-25 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Shuah Khan, Brendan Higgins, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 6:05 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:9:
[...snip...]
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 8f0877c26e4b ("thunderbolt: test: Remove some casts which are no longer required")
>
These are fixed by this patch, which hopefully will be in kunit-fixes soon:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210624084823.15031-1-davidgow@google.com/
There's also another issue which can cause a build failure, fixed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210625111603.358518-1-davidgow@google.com/
With those two patches applied, the kselftest/kunit-fixes branch
should build fine, and all of the thunderbolt tests pass.
Sorry about the fuss!
Cheers,
-- David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
2021-06-25 10:05 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-25 11:31 ` David Gow
@ 2021-06-25 15:48 ` Shuah Khan
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2021-06-25 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, Brendan Higgins
Cc: David Gow, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List,
Shuah Khan
On 6/25/21 4:05 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:9:
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_single_hop_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:455:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 455 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:455:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 455 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:466:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 466 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:466:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 466 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_daisy_chain_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:512:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 512 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:512:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 512 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:523:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 523 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:523:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 523 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_simple_tree_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:573:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 573 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:573:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 573 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:584:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 584 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:584:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 584 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_complex_tree_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:655:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 655 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:655:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 655 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:666:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 666 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:666:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 666 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_max_length_walk':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:756:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 756 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:756:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 756 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:767:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 767 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:767:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 767 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, p->config.type, test_data[i].type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane0':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:850:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 850 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:850:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 850 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:853:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 853 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:853:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 853 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:910:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 910 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:910:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 910 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:913:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 913 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:913:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 913 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:988:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 988 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:988:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 988 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:991:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 991 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:991:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 991 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_not_bonded_lane1_chain_reverse':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1066:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1066 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1066:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1066 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1069:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1069 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1069:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1069 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_mixed_chain':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1156:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1156 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1156:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1156 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1159:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1159 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1159:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1159 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c: In function 'tb_test_path_mixed_chain_reverse':
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1246:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1246 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1246:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1246 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, in_port->config.type, test_data[i].in_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1249:25: error: 'typeof' applied to a bit-field
> 1249 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:804:9: note: in definition of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_BINARY_ASSERTION'
> 804 | typeof(left) __left = (left); \
> | ^~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:918:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 918 | KUNIT_BASE_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:928:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION'
> 928 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> include/kunit/test.h:1291:2: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION'
> 1291 | KUNIT_BINARY_EQ_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION, left, right)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/thunderbolt/test.c:1249:3: note: in expansion of macro 'KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ'
> 1249 | KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, out_port->config.type, test_data[i].out_type);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 8f0877c26e4b ("thunderbolt: test: Remove some casts which are no longer required")
>
I am applying them now. Okay to add your Aked-by Brendan?
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
@ 2024-08-05 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-06 2:06 ` David Gow
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2024-08-05 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuah Khan, Brendan Higgins
Cc: David Gow, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 446 bytes --]
Hi all,
After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: modpost: "__start_rodata" [lib/kunit/kunit.ko] undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "__end_rodata" [lib/kunit/kunit.ko] undefined!
Caused by commit
7d3c33b290b1 ("kunit: Device wrappers should also manage driver name")
I have used the kunit-fixes tree from next-20240805 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
2024-08-05 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
@ 2024-08-06 2:06 ` David Gow
2024-08-06 19:20 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2024-08-06 2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Shuah Khan, Brendan Higgins, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 574 bytes --]
On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 07:18, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ERROR: modpost: "__start_rodata" [lib/kunit/kunit.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: modpost: "__end_rodata" [lib/kunit/kunit.ko] undefined!
>
> Caused by commit
>
> 7d3c33b290b1 ("kunit: Device wrappers should also manage driver name")
>
Thanks. I think this should fix it:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240806020136.3481593-1-davidgow@google.com/
Cheers,
-- David
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4014 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
2024-08-06 2:06 ` David Gow
@ 2024-08-06 19:20 ` Shuah Khan
2024-08-06 22:29 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-08-06 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Gow, Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Brendan Higgins, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Shuah Khan
On 8/5/24 20:06, David Gow wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 07:18, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> ERROR: modpost: "__start_rodata" [lib/kunit/kunit.ko] undefined!
>> ERROR: modpost: "__end_rodata" [lib/kunit/kunit.ko] undefined!
>>
>> Caused by commit
>>
>> 7d3c33b290b1 ("kunit: Device wrappers should also manage driver name")
>>
>
David,
Looks like the above patch below is still under review - I can drop
7d3c33b290b1 for now to avoid build failures. Thoughts?
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree
2024-08-06 19:20 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2024-08-06 22:29 ` Shuah Khan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2024-08-06 22:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Gow, Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Brendan Higgins, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List, Shuah Khan
On 8/6/24 13:20, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 8/5/24 20:06, David Gow wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 07:18, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the kunit-fixes tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
>>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>>>
>>> ERROR: modpost: "__start_rodata" [lib/kunit/kunit.ko] undefined!
>>> ERROR: modpost: "__end_rodata" [lib/kunit/kunit.ko] undefined!
>>>
>>> Caused by commit
>>>
>>> 7d3c33b290b1 ("kunit: Device wrappers should also manage driver name")
>>>
>>
>
> David,
>
> Looks like the above patch below is still under review - I can drop
> 7d3c33b290b1 for now to avoid build failures. Thoughts?
>
7d3c33b290b1 ("kunit: Device wrappers should also manage driver name")
I did drop this patch for now from linux-kselftest kunit-fixes branch.
I will pull the two patches together when the patch below is ready.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20240806020136.3481593-1-davidgow@google.com/
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-06 22:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-06-25 9:52 linux-next: build failure after merge of the kunit-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-25 17:53 ` Daniel Latypov
2021-06-25 18:12 ` Shuah Khan
2021-06-25 18:46 ` Brendan Higgins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-25 10:05 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-25 11:31 ` David Gow
2021-06-25 15:48 ` Shuah Khan
2024-08-05 23:18 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-06 2:06 ` David Gow
2024-08-06 19:20 ` Shuah Khan
2024-08-06 22:29 ` Shuah Khan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox