linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>,
	Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@sjtu.edu.cn>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the rdma-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 10:52:12 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211001135212.GR964074@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210930113518.4b9f55e6@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:35:18AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   7d5cfafe8b40 ("RDMA/hfi1: Fix kernel pointer leak")
> 
> from the rdma-fixes tree and commit:
> 
>   f5dc70a0e142 ("IB/hfi1: Tune netdev xmit cachelines")
> 
> from the rdma tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

It looks OK, thanks

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-01 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-30  1:35 linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the rdma-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-01 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-06  1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-06 10:24 ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-03-06 11:35   ` Zhu Yanjun
     [not found] ` <4d66668a-ff8e-48f6-a5e3-98ada08c5037@linux.dev>
2025-03-06 20:33   ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-28  1:38 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-28  9:59 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-01-06  0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-23  2:22 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-23 15:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-07-10  1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-10  5:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-06-27  0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-27  5:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-05-01  0:10 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-01  0:55 ` Doug Ledford
2018-05-02 10:22   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-05-02 14:00     ` Doug Ledford
2018-05-02 17:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-03-22  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  1:51 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  1:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  3:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211001135212.GR964074@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mike.marciniszyn@cornelisnetworks.com \
    --cc=qtxuning1999@sjtu.edu.cn \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).