From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: broonie@kernel.org
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the nand tree with the mtd tree
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:16:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220221151612.67a2dfbc@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220221135552.2196160-1-broonie@kernel.org>
Hello,
broonie@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:55:52 +0000:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the nand tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
> 751f204a6fe6f ("dt-bindings: mtd: nand-chip: Create a NAND chip description")
>
> from the mtd tree and commit:
>
> cb57fae479be4 ("dt-binding: mtd: nand: Document the wp-gpios property")
>
> from the nand tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Thanks for fixing it up in -next. We will anyway merge the NAND tree
into the MTD tree before sending a unique PR so Linus won't have to
handle it.
>
> diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml
> index 33855eb48a795,53b21aed0ac5f..0000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand-controller.yaml
> @@@ -116,6 -154,20 +116,13 @@@ patternProperties
> Ready/Busy pins. Active state refers to the NAND ready state and
> should be set to GPIOD_ACTIVE_HIGH unless the signal is inverted.
>
> + wp-gpios:
> + description:
> + Contains one GPIO descriptor for the Write Protect pin.
> + Active state refers to the NAND Write Protect state and should be
> + set to GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW unless the signal is inverted.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> - secure-regions:
> - $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint64-matrix
> - description:
> - Regions in the NAND chip which are protected using a secure element
> - like Trustzone. This property contains the start address and size of
> - the secure regions present.
> -
> required:
> - reg
>
Thanks,
Miquèl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 13:55 linux-next: manual merge of the nand tree with the mtd tree broonie
2022-02-21 14:16 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-11-18 0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-21 1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-21 7:27 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220221151612.67a2dfbc@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).