public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with the asm-generic tree
@ 2022-02-22 11:42 broonie
  2022-02-22 13:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: broonie @ 2022-02-22 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Bogendoerfer
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the mips tree got a conflict in:

  arch/mips/sibyte/common/sb_tbprof.c

between commit:

  27e8140d7819b ("uaccess: fix type mismatch warnings from access_ok()")

from the asm-generic tree and commit:

  10242464e506b ("MIPS: sibyte: Add missing __user annotations in sb_tbprof.c")

from the mips tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --cc arch/mips/sibyte/common/sb_tbprof.c
index 01d00b87d0f5a,bc47681e825a3..0000000000000
--- a/arch/mips/sibyte/common/sb_tbprof.c
+++ b/arch/mips/sibyte/common/sb_tbprof.c

(used the head version)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with the asm-generic tree
  2022-02-22 11:42 linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with the asm-generic tree broonie
@ 2022-02-22 13:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2022-02-22 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Brown
  Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer, Arnd Bergmann, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List

On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:42 PM <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the mips tree got a conflict in:
>
>   arch/mips/sibyte/common/sb_tbprof.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   27e8140d7819b ("uaccess: fix type mismatch warnings from access_ok()")
>
> from the asm-generic tree and commit:
>
>   10242464e506b ("MIPS: sibyte: Add missing __user annotations in sb_tbprof.c")
>
> from the mips tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Thanks for the report. I needed to rebase my tree anyway, dropped
the duplicate change from my local copy for now, should be part of
my public branch in a few days when I send a new version of the series.

       Arnd

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-22 13:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-02-22 11:42 linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with the asm-generic tree broonie
2022-02-22 13:41 ` Arnd Bergmann

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox