Linux-Next discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with the arm64-fixes tree
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:14:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220721161458.GA17567@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220721204517.53bab2a3@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 08:45:17PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 09:45:12 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   f7b4c3b82e7d ("arm64: set UXN on swapper page tables")
> > 
> > from the arm64-fixes tree and commits:
> > 
> >   e42ade29e3bc ("arm64: head: split off idmap creation code")
> >   c3cee924bd85 ("arm64: head: cover entire kernel image in initial ID map")
> > 
> > from the arm64 tree.
> > 
> > I didn't know if the change from the former was still needed after the
> > changes in the latter, so I left it out for now.
> 
> OK, so my arm64 defconfig build produced these errors:
> 
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S: Assembler messages:
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:334: Error: immediate cannot be moved by a single instruction
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:343: Error: immediate cannot be moved by a single instruction
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:354: Error: immediate cannot be moved by a single instruction
> arch/arm64/kernel/head.S:379: Error: immediate cannot be moved by a single instruction
> arch/arm64/mm/proc.S:296: Error: immediate cannot be moved by a single instruction
> 
> So I tried this patch:
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 20:21:36 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] fixup for "arm64: set UXN on swapper page tables"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/head.S | 8 ++++----
>  arch/arm64/mm/proc.S     | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index cefe6a73ee54..aa7c58689f68 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> @@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_START_LOCAL(create_idmap)
>  	adrp	x0, init_idmap_pg_dir
>  	adrp	x3, _text
>  	adrp	x6, _end + MAX_FDT_SIZE + SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE
> -	mov	x7, SWAPPER_RX_MMUFLAGS
> +	mov_q	x7, SWAPPER_RX_MMUFLAGS

[...]

I think Marc posted something similar here:

https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721124244.903567-1-maz@kernel.org

but in further discussion offline (and echoed on that thread), we've decided
to drop f7b4c3b82e7d ("arm64: set UXN on swapper page tables") for now; the
issue it addresses doesn't affect the hardware which is readily available at
the moment so we'll just get it into -stable instead rather than disrupt
everything at this stage in the release cycle.

> So I gave up and left arm64 broken for today :-(

No problem, thank you for trying and hopefully it will be better tomorrow
once we've dropped that commit.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-21 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-20 23:45 linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with the arm64-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21 10:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21 16:14   ` Will Deacon [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-29 23:35 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-06 22:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-07  7:42 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-30 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2020-12-01  8:37 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-26 23:35 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-06 22:38 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-27 23:19 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220721161458.GA17567@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox