From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Ilan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:23:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221019162324.2baaa7e8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221020032340.5cf101c0@canb.auug.org.au>
On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 03:23:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> net/mac80211/util.c
>
> between commit:
>
> ff05d4b45dd8 ("wifi: mac80211: fix MBSSID parsing use-after-free")
>
> from the origin tree and commit:
>
> ff05d4b45dd8 ("wifi: mac80211: fix MBSSID parsing use-after-free")
Dunno if this is a glitch or real problem. But it reminds me - I see
there is direct wireless -> wireless-next merge without going via
Linus's tree. I think you may have mentioned it to us, but not sure
if I said this clearly - let's try to avoid such merges. Linus certainly
doesn't like when we do net -> net-next merges without sending net to
him first and forwarding. I'm not 100% sure why (maybe Steven knows)
- whether it's an aesthetic thing or avoiding real issues thing, but
either way it's _a_ thing :S
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 23:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-19 16:23 linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-19 23:23 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-10-19 17:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-19 23:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-26 12:40 ` Kalle Valo
2022-10-26 14:35 ` Kalle Valo
2022-10-26 14:50 ` Kalle Valo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-10-09 0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-09 6:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-09 6:51 ` Johannes Berg
2024-10-09 7:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-09 7:19 ` Johannes Berg
2024-10-09 7:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-09 8:30 ` Johannes Berg
2024-10-09 9:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-10-09 0:38 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-26 1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-26 4:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2023-09-14 0:28 Stephen Rothwell
2013-07-25 1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23 1:16 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-23 20:18 ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2011-11-22 3:20 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221019162324.2baaa7e8@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ilan.peer@intel.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).