From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23010C433FE for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:53:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229901AbiJSXxC (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:53:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37874 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229736AbiJSXxB (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:53:01 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3FF017534F; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:53:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FE4061342; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69912C433C1; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 23:52:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1666223579; bh=6kyUB5tKFDB5XUjFi6QCd6MkTS2oO8t5uING/AE0Fjw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qBPIclqEN6ga3sptd0OAkLER6swsxHPJec6x1ajyDUojN8Haz1Rs8MFew5rbT+TbE ltLtcAX3exTMIe6KMxj88RYDRQxNEsIom2ddEXEDrkMvGfYVJCgkZX1vovlYfjk1XW oV9cUMpG7TlfoXkZ3c9JxpZ9Y17cWj3utqWNtWBPRI2ZSN+oF+JhDHSjWO9T00KJgi Jhk/WgOEnpqEGBAMDGWCcHzz1RhSCK5c1uz8WvyeBPuudQa+cJIO9tSpuCGvAWefNd /hXaiwj+PspiN+PGUVbe1pCODmjhL1veuwgeqOUOe/RXab4vpP5n0eAbCo8xkkMkYo p7YRLTpM5O3CA== Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 16:52:58 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Johannes Berg , Kalle Valo , Johannes Berg , Wireless , David Miller , Ilan Peer , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-next tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20221019165258.1ea6daa6@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20221020041440.3f6c1e46@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20221020032340.5cf101c0@canb.auug.org.au> <20221019162324.2baaa7e8@kernel.org> <20221020041440.3f6c1e46@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 04:14:40 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Dunno if this is a glitch or real problem. But it reminds me - I see > > there is direct wireless -> wireless-next merge without going via > > Linus's tree. I think you may have mentioned it to us, but not sure > > if I said this clearly - let's try to avoid such merges. Linus certainly > > doesn't like when we do net -> net-next merges without sending net to > > him first and forwarding. I'm not 100% sure why (maybe Steven knows) > > - whether it's an aesthetic thing or avoiding real issues thing, but > > either way it's _a_ thing :S > > Has Linus really complained about you merging the net tree into the > net-next tree? I can't find that exchange right now. Maybe it was about merging back his tree into ours without submitting a PR. Hm.