From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com>,
Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm-lumag tree with Linus', drm-msm trees
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:23:50 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230119122350.2a767def@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1331 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-msm-lumag tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
between commits:
d73b1d02de08 ("drm/msm: Hangcheck progress detection")
8636500300a0 ("drm/msm: Fix failure paths in msm_drm_init()")
from Linus', drm-msm trees and commit:
643b7d0869cc ("drm/msm: Add missing check and destroy for alloc_ordered_workqueue")
from the drm-msm-lumag tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
index 0509e90d05e3,b052327181b2..000000000000
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
@@@ -420,7 -418,11 +420,9 @@@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *
priv->dev = ddev;
priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("msm", 0);
+ if (!priv->wq)
+ return -ENOMEM;
- priv->hangcheck_period = DRM_MSM_HANGCHECK_DEFAULT_PERIOD;
-
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->objects);
mutex_init(&priv->obj_lock);
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2023-01-19 1:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-19 1:23 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2023-01-19 2:03 ` linux-next: manual merge of the drm-msm-lumag tree with Linus', drm-msm trees Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230119122350.2a767def@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_akhilpo@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox