From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F58C77B7E for ; Thu, 25 May 2023 12:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232045AbjEYMus (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2023 08:50:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36170 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230464AbjEYMur (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 May 2023 08:50:47 -0400 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com (esa.microchip.iphmx.com [68.232.153.233]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0423812F; Thu, 25 May 2023 05:50:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1685019046; x=1716555046; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=gnIghBiDVeI92f1OSI9YGrzltj/g25Nt66G/3GQMoc4=; b=vYwovre1ftkpFRKK2ZZBnGvToyg8r7ZW6e7TCosV6ERHgbL8brt2LTu4 dhWRcLqGdA9ctjBo+ZxHJ1Qx9cYM8bHAyUtJH6hjZCdO6DgSUXI19m7bF ORCcU9SdvVX9vXxVQbmUmSUNdPCSvLSk9zhxSl6OscmhOuz5U5Ym55pJU r3X2DEm4xekOdwxZ9Z7zRHDkscM9SFsN5f7zXdRvZHixnuDV9P3vjHzGh iYocbt4u+RKOgBShv2OyuNTPD65gm/4fLI9bBAPlGM2o+q4nxDuQbUFS6 UjMpsPN7thqgAC7aiDyw+S1o6Bv0a3HtZ1Ydx1znBgttyEasGNCQ7qLH0 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,191,1681196400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="215444870" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN Received: from unknown (HELO email.microchip.com) ([170.129.1.10]) by esa5.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 25 May 2023 05:50:45 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21; Thu, 25 May 2023 05:50:44 -0700 Received: from wendy (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.21 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 25 May 2023 05:50:42 -0700 Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 13:50:19 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Palmer Dabbelt CC: Conor Dooley , , Arnd Bergmann , , Stephen Rothwell , , , Paul Walmsley , , , Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 15 (several RV64 build errors) Message-ID: <20230525-scoff-eldest-57ec643005dc@wendy> References: <20230524-scalping-number-63ec10c1f7bf@spud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GA19nHWYt1Z7wyOt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --GA19nHWYt1Z7wyOt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 04:11:05PM -0700, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Wed, 24 May 2023 15:49:41 PDT (-0700), Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 03:41:15PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > XIP_KERNEL already has "depends on !COMPILE_TEST", since April of 202= 1. > >=20 > > Half of me wants to say just remove XIP_KERNEL entirely. Or make it > > depend on BROKEN, since noone seems to actually test it and I don't > > think we even know if it works right now? >=20 > Ya, let's do it. If it's broken and nobody has said anything but > randconfig, then probably nobody's using it. Let's mark it as broken or > deprecated or whatever and then see if anyone complains. Apart from being able to generate kernels that are broken (IOW this randconfig), when we changed the dtb back to being in the fix, we removed some special case XIP_KERNEL stuff (that's commit f1581626071c ("riscv: Do not set initial_boot_params to the linear address of the dtb")) where Alex didn't know for sure whether it was safe to do. Vexriscv (which is Myrtle I think) & Vitaly Wool both have an interest in it. I dunno Myrtle's email, but I've CCed Vitaly. Maybe someone can at least test the thing :) Cheers, Conor. --GA19nHWYt1Z7wyOt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZG9ZiwAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0uTYAQD75o4X0KcjEEibuYRBtbJxLrzul579rcG5gj7RbbR/WQEAyRAKttZ1DLiQ bjZFN8t3FSiE3wAGS14B7QIwTxW+mgE= =b8Nx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GA19nHWYt1Z7wyOt--