* linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree
@ 2023-06-02 3:31 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-02 6:40 ` Peter Rosin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-06-02 3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Rosin, Greg KH, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 490 bytes --]
Hi all,
The following commits are also in the char-misc tree as different
commits (but the same patches):
213700a8b96f ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
76ac787cd671 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
These are commits
8258d997b874 ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
5ccf40288ca0 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
in the char-misc tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree
2023-06-02 3:31 linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2023-06-02 6:40 ` Peter Rosin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Rosin @ 2023-06-02 6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, Greg KH, Arnd Bergmann
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
Hi!
2023-06-02 at 05:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commits are also in the char-misc tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
>
> 213700a8b96f ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
> 76ac787cd671 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
>
> These are commits
>
> 8258d997b874 ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
> 5ccf40288ca0 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
>
> in the char-misc tree.
I didn't think this was an issue, so I have now removed them from the
mux for-next branch.
Going forward, I will try to time the removal from the mux for-next branch
when I hear from Greg that the patches have hit char-misc/for-next.
The reason for all this is that the patch-stream for mux is just a trickle,
so Greg is not pulling my tree, and I instead send patches. I still want to
see how patches fare in -next before I pass them on, so this is probably
going to happen again from time to time.
Cheers,
Peter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-02 6:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-02 3:31 linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-02 6:40 ` Peter Rosin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox