public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree
@ 2023-06-02  3:31 Stephen Rothwell
  2023-06-02  6:40 ` Peter Rosin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2023-06-02  3:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Rosin, Greg KH, Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 490 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commits are also in the char-misc tree as different
commits (but the same patches):

  213700a8b96f ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
  76ac787cd671 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")

These are commits

  8258d997b874 ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
  5ccf40288ca0 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")

in the char-misc tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree
  2023-06-02  3:31 linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2023-06-02  6:40 ` Peter Rosin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Rosin @ 2023-06-02  6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Greg KH, Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

Hi!

2023-06-02 at 05:31, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in the char-misc tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
> 
>   213700a8b96f ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
>   76ac787cd671 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
> 
> These are commits
> 
>   8258d997b874 ("dt-bindings: ti-serdes-mux: Add defines for J784S4 SoC")
>   5ccf40288ca0 ("mux: mmio: drop obsolete dependency on COMPILE_TEST")
> 
> in the char-misc tree.

I didn't think this was an issue, so I have now removed them from the
mux for-next branch.

Going forward, I will try to time the removal from the mux for-next branch
when I hear from Greg that the patches have hit char-misc/for-next.

The reason for all this is that the patch-stream for mux is just a trickle,
so Greg is not pulling my tree, and I instead send patches. I still want to
see how patches fare in -next before I pass them on, so this is probably
going to happen again from time to time.

Cheers,
Peter

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-02  6:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-02  3:31 linux-next: duplicate patches in the mux tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-02  6:40 ` Peter Rosin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox